Comparing the Cost of Clinical Trials Across the US

Clinical research is a complex and expensive endeavor, and professors involved in such projects often struggle to obtain resources in the academic environment and face special challenges in achieving academic promotion and tenure. In California, any research project that requires the use of a Schedule I or Schedule II controlled substance must be submitted to the California Research Advisory Panel for review and approval, adding an extra layer of complexity to the process. The Orphan Drug Act, enacted in 1983, provides seven years of market exclusivity for drugs that treat conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the United States. According to a sample of drugs in clinical trials, for every 100 drugs that entered phase I trials, about 60 were in phase II, just over 20 were entering phase III trials, and only about 12 obtained FDA approval.

Doctors who work with pharmaceutical companies are subject to a great deal of scrutiny due to the media's attention to cases of conflict of interest. Patient recruitment is one of the most significant obstacles to conducting clinical trials in the United States. Fundamental trials also provide critical safety information, which is evaluated in phase I studies on pharmacokinetic effects and specialized safety studies when needed. Conducting tests in several centers in different countries increases the barriers associated with multicenter testing, including the lack of harmonization between regulations and difficulties in ensuring protocol coherence. The cost of clinical trials varies from state to state.

In practical terms, conducting tests in several centers in different countries increases the barriers associated with multicenter testing, including the lack of harmonization between regulations and difficulties in ensuring protocol coherence. The interface is designed to allow users to compare a “custom scenario” with a “default scenario” based on average costs of clinical trials and other parameters from the literature and data provided by Medidata Solutions. Table 4 provides estimates of expected reductions in costs per study by phase due to the adoption of EHRs (Electronic Health Records) in clinical research in different therapeutic areas. The first step in estimating the impact of this alternative is to quantify the cost effect of moving away from 100 percent of SDV (Source Data Verification) in an average clinical trial. In conclusion, conducting clinical trials can be expensive and complex, especially when done in California due to additional regulations.

The cost varies from state to state and depends on many factors such as patient recruitment, safety information, and EHRs adoption.

Rosemarie Barrera
Rosemarie Barrera

Total web enthusiast. Certified entrepreneur. Unapologetic beer fan. Typical beeraholic. Hardcore twitter evangelist. Travel geek.

Leave a Comment

All fileds with * are required